anesthetic vs RATS
| anesthetic | RATS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $300/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | desktop | desktop |
| Scripting support | Yes | Yes |
| Bayesian analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Data import formats | PolyChord, MultiNest, UltraNest, Nested_fit, CosmoMC, Cobaya, GetDist-compatible chains, anesthetic CSV files | Excel, text, Stata, EViews, Matlab, Haver, SQL/ODBC, FRED, CRSP, FAME |
| Statistical tests | — | Yes |
| Regression models | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Statistical Analysis Software. On Specifiction, RATS scores higher on our published basis.