Cisco pyATS vs ONAP
| Cisco pyATS | ONAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Configuration management | Yes | Yes |
| Workflow orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Network testing | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Cisco IOS, Cisco IOXE, Cisco IOSXR, Cisco NXOS, Cisco ASA; CLI, NETCONF, RESTCONF | physical network functions; virtual network functions; cloud-native network functions |
Both are listed in Best Network Automation Software. On Specifiction, ONAP scores higher on our published basis.