Containerlab vs ONAP
| Containerlab | ONAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Configuration management | Yes | Yes |
| Workflow orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Network testing | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Nokia SR Linux/SR OS/SR-SIM, Cisco XRd/XRv/XRv9k/CSR1000v/Nexus 9000v/Catalyst 9000v/IOL/ASAv/FTDv, Juniper cRPD/cSRX/vMX/vQFX/vSRX/vJunos, Arista, SONiC, Cumulus VX, VyOS, FRR, VPP, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OpenWRT, Linux containers, generic VMs, and more | physical network functions; virtual network functions; cloud-native network functions |
Both are listed in Best Network Automation Software. On Specifiction, Containerlab scores higher on our published basis.