CryptoPhoto vs PingID
| CryptoPhoto | PingID | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $3/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | Android, iOS, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported factors | photo matching; biometrics; passphrase; cryptographic token | Push notifications; TOTP/OATH one-time passcodes; SMS; email; voice call; FIDO authentication; username and password |
| App integration methods | API; SDK/libraries; plugins; PAM module; virtual or physical appliances | RADIUS; SAML; REST API; non-standard interfaces |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 6 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Specifiction, PingID scores higher on our published basis.