CVE Binary Tool vs OpenSCA
| CVE Binary Tool | OpenSCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | Dart (pubspec.lock); Go (go.mod); Java (pom.xml, JAR/WAR/EAR); JavaScript (package-lock.json, yarn.lock); OpenWrt opkg (.control); Perl (cpanfile); Python (requirements.txt, PKG-INFO, METADATA, .whl, .egg); Rust (Cargo.lock); Ruby (Gemfile.lock); R (renv.lock); Swift (Package.resolved); Windows PE (.pyd) | Java/Maven, Java/Gradle, JavaScript/NPM, PHP/Composer, Ruby/gem, Golang/Go mod, Rust/cargo, Erlang/Rebar, Python/Pip |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Specifiction, OpenSCA scores higher on our published basis.