FOSSA vs Veracode DAST
| FOSSA | Veracode DAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | C#/.NET (DLL, NuGet); C/C++ (Make); Go (Dep, Glide, go get, Go modules, GoDep, GoVendor, Trash); Java (Ant, Gradle, JARs, Maven); JavaScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn); Kotlin (Gradle, JARs, Maven); Objective-C (CocoaPods); PHP (Composer); Python (pip, Pipenv, Poetry); Ruby (Bundler); Scala (JARs, SBT); Swift (CocoaPods); TypeScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn) |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | cloud |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On Specifiction, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.