JuiceFS vs SUSE Multi-Linux Manager
| JuiceFS | SUSE Multi-Linux Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Paid from | 0.02 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | — |
| Storage protocols | POSIX, HDFS, S3, WebDAV | Object Gateway, RADOS Block Device, CephFS, librados |
| Replication | Yes | — |
| Erasure coding | No | — |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | — |
| S3-compatible access | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On Specifiction, JuiceFS scores higher on our published basis.