Komodor vs Open Cluster Management
| Komodor | Open Cluster Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, extension, Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Supported environments | Self-managed Kubernetes, EKS, GKE, AKS, on-premises, Komodor Managed Cloud | Kubernetes clusters on cloud providers including GKE, EKS, and AKS; local kind clusters; on-premises environments |
| Multi-cluster management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy enforcement | Yes | Yes |
| Upgrade management | Yes | Yes |
| Control plane management | — | customer-managed |
| Cluster provisioning | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Kubernetes Management Platforms. On Specifiction, Komodor scores higher on our published basis.