LDoc vs Natural Docs
| LDoc | Natural Docs | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Source inputs | Lua source files, C/C++ extension source, Markdown documents and readme files, source examples | source code, text files |
| API reference generation | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | — |
| Output formats | HTML | HTML |
| Programming languages | Lua, C/C++ extension source | ActionScript, Ada, Assembly, C, C++, C#, ColdFusion, Fortran, Java, JavaScript, Lua, Makefiles, MSBuild Files, Pascal/Delphi, Perl, PHP, PL/SQL, PowerBuilder, PowerShell, Python, R, Ruby, SystemVerilog, Tcl, Text Files, Visual Basic |
Both are listed in Best Documentation Generators. On Specifiction, LDoc scores higher on our published basis.