Mideye Server vs PingID
| Mideye Server | PingID | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $3/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Android, iOS, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported factors | SMS OTP, Mideye+ push, TOTP/HOTP authenticator apps, hardware tokens, Magic Link, Assisted Login | Push notifications; TOTP/OATH one-time passcodes; SMS; email; voice call; FIDO authentication; username and password |
| App integration methods | RADIUS, RADSEC, REST API over HTTPS, LDAP/LDAPS, Microsoft Graph API | RADIUS; SAML; REST API; non-standard interfaces |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Paid from | — | 6 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Specifiction, PingID scores higher on our published basis.