Veracode DAST vs ZeroPath
| Veracode DAST | ZeroPath | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | $1,000/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | C#/.NET (DLL, NuGet); C/C++ (Make); Go (Dep, Glide, go get, Go modules, GoDep, GoVendor, Trash); Java (Ant, Gradle, JARs, Maven); JavaScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn); Kotlin (Gradle, JARs, Maven); Objective-C (CocoaPods); PHP (Composer); Python (pip, Pipenv, Poetry); Ruby (Bundler); Scala (JARs, SBT); Swift (CocoaPods); TypeScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn) | — |
| SBOM generation | Yes | — |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | cloud | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 60 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best SAST Tools. On Specifiction, Veracode DAST scores higher on our published basis.