Goodloading

Overview

Goodloading calculates space use, proposes load arrangements and lets users refine them in 3D. It covers cubic loads, barrels, pipes, trailers, sea and air containers, and pallets, with recommendations for a suitable vehicle or container. That breadth is useful for operators working across transport modes; the value is less clear for teams whose needs are limited to a narrow cargo type or a simple volume estimate.

Plans can account for axle loads, permissible total weight, center of gravity, wheel arches and cooling units. Projects can include several loading and unloading locations, keeping goods for different stops separate. Users can enter loads manually or import CSV and XLSX files, then share a project by link or PDF with its loading animation and sequence.

Key features

• Automated planning with manual adjustment: Automatic distribution and space-use calculations provide a starting arrangement, while 3D editing gives planners room to correct it. Vehicle and container recommendations can help narrow choices, but the free plan excludes some of the controls needed to adapt plans to specific cargo and equipment.
• Operational constraints: Axle loads, total weight, center of gravity and physical obstructions make planning more relevant than simple volume packing. These controls are a meaningful reason to consider Goodloading when load compliance matters, though axle-load planning is not included in the free version.
• Multistop projects: Separating cargo by loading and unloading location can help prevent goods for later stops from being buried under earlier deliveries. Multiple vehicle stops are excluded from the free version, so this advantage requires a paid plan.
• Integration: A RESTful API can connect Goodloading with TMS, WMS, ERP and route-planning systems. Verified integration applicants can test all API features with 300 requests per month and full technical support; requests require an access token in the header. That makes the API useful for evaluation, not an unlimited test environment.
• Sharing and security: Link and PDF sharing preserve the loading sequence and animation, but collaborator sharing is excluded from the free version. The privacy policy says SSL encryption is used and personal-data access is restricted to personnel who need it and are bound by confidentiality obligations.

Pricing

Goodloading uses a freemium model, with a free plan and a 7-day trial. The Freemium plan costs 0.00 USD per free and includes default load and cargo-space dimensions. It excludes palletization, oval loads and axle loads; the broader free-version exclusions also cover custom load dimensions, angled rotation, multiple vehicle stops, advanced container details and collaborator sharing. That is enough to explore standard-dimension planning, but not enough for teams that rely on those controls or shared work.

The free plan is a sensible starting point for an individual assessing basic load arrangements. Teams that need constraint-heavy planning, multistop projects, advanced container detail or collaboration should compare the trial experience with their actual workflow before committing; custom pricing applies where a plan price is not given.

Platforms

Goodloading runs in a browser and supports Linux and macOS computers, as well as API integration. On mobile, users can view saved projects but cannot edit them, which makes it unsuitable as a mobile-first planning tool. Support is available by form or email, and the company offers online demonstrations.

Who it's for

Goodloading is aimed at road, sea and air transport companies, freight forwarders, logistics operators, manufacturers, stores, software providers and educational institutions. It is the strongest fit for teams that plan varied cargo against vehicle or container constraints and can benefit from multistop separation or system integration. It is a weaker choice for mobile editors, or for free-tier users who need axle-load calculations, multiple stops or collaborator sharing.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Broad support for cargo and transport spaces makes it relevant across road, sea and air operations.
• Pros: 3D manual adjustment complements algorithmic planning, while weight and obstruction constraints support more practical plans.
• Pros: Multistop projects, sequence-aware sharing and a RESTful API suit workflows that extend beyond a single loading calculation.
• Cons: Free-version exclusions remove several consequential controls, including axle loads, multistop planning and collaborator sharing.
• Cons: Mobile access is view-only, so editing still requires a computer.

Alternatives

For a broader comparison, see Load Planning Software. Choose ALPHA LOADING when an education licence for teachers and students, with up to 30 accounts per class, is the priority. CargoLoader3D is an option for teams seeking Android or iOS support and a free tier with manual placement and detailed reporting. LoadOptimizer.ai suits readers who want a paid Standard plan at 39.99 EUR per month for unlimited AI optimizations, or a Pro plan with REST API access at 99.99 EUR per month.

MAXCUBE may fit users whose main requirement is a free daily packing computation, capped at one container, 2,000 cargo items and three SKU types. MediaBeacon is a paid alternative with cloud or on-premise deployment and pricing by discovery call. LOP offers a free tier capped at three plans per month, one container and 20 items per plan, with one seat and no exports. EasyCargo is an option for buyers who prefer paid tickets, including a 9.70 USD one-time 24-hour ticket sold in packs of at least 10, or a 79.00 USD monthly plan. LoadingMCP is another browser and API alternative with a free 3D planner and compliance verdict that needs no login or card.

Verdict

Goodloading is a strong choice for transport and logistics teams that need 3D load planning across varied cargo spaces, practical constraints and multistop projects, especially when API integration is part of the workflow. Its main drawback is the gap between that breadth and the free tier: axle loads, multiple stops and collaboration are among the exclusions. Look elsewhere if mobile editing is essential or if those controls must be available without moving beyond the free plan.