Tech riderRev. 24 Sept 2026
- 1Runs onWeb
- 2CostsNot stated by the maker
- 3Deploymentself hosted
- 4Framework supportjQuery
- 5Structured contentNo
- 6Real-time collaborationNo
- 7Table editingYes
- 8Media handlingImage and file uploads; video embedding from YouTube, Facebook, Vimeo, and Dailymotion
7 lines stated Written from the maker's own pages: github.com

Overview
RichText is ranked #23 of 37 in rich text editor software on Specifiction. It runs on Web.
Compared on rich text editor software
- Free plan
- Yesgithub.com
- Deployment
- self_hostedgithub.com
- Framework support
- jQuerygithub.com
- Structured content
- Nogithub.com
- Real-time collaboration
- Nogithub.com
- Table editing
- Yesgithub.com
- Media handling
- Image and file uploads; video embedding from YouTube, Facebook, Vimeo, and Dailymotiongithub.com
Best RichText alternatives
See all 20 All accessCh 01 CKEditor 5 Free planFree trialAndroid from $160/mo7.7 All accessCh 02 AiEditor Free planAndroidiOS Free to start7.4 All accessCh 03 TinyMCE Free planFree trialAPI from $6.58/mo7.4 All accessCh 04 Tiptap Free planFree trialAPI from $49/mo7.4 All accessCh 05 Editor.js Free planAndroidiOS Free to start7.1 All accessCh 06 BlockNote Free planself-hostedWeb from $195/mo7.0
Where it ranks on Specifiction
Is RichText yours?
Claim it for free: prove the domain, then correct facts, plans and screenshots. An editor reviews every change.


