TestingBot
testingbot.com
What it is
TestingBot provides a cloud testing grid for automated and manual testing on real browsers and physical mobile devices. Its options include live manual, visual, automated, and AI-assisted testing, with support stated for Selenium, Appium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, Espresso, XCUITest, and Maestro. Automated tests can run in parallel, with concurrency controlled through test configuration or a CI pipeline. Listed integrations include Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, Bamboo, TeamCity, Travis CI, Jira, and Slack. A public REST API and webhooks support custom integrations. TestingBot lists a free plan and a 14-day trial. Live costs €20 a year, billed annually, or €30 month-to-month; Automated costs €50 a year, billed annually, or €70 month-to-month. Pay As You Go costs €60, paid once payment, and Automated Pro costs €90 a year, billed annually, or €120 month-to-month. Enterprise pricing is by contact. TestingBot says sessions use isolated machines or devices wiped after testing, with test artifacts stored and processed in EU datacenters.
Spec sheet
- What it does
- TestingBot is a cloud platform for automated, manual, visual and AI-assisted testing across more than 6,100 real browsers and physical mobile devices.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Product
- TestingBot provides a cloud testing grid for automated and manual testing on real browsers and physical mobile devices.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Deployment
- The pricing FAQ says Enterprise supports private cloud and that on-premise deployments are not supported.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- API
- TestingBot provides a public REST API and webhooks for custom integrations.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Integrations
- Official integrations include Slack, Jira, GitHub and CI/CD systems such as GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, Travis CI, TeamCity and Azure DevOps.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Security
- TestingBot states that each test uses a single-use machine and wiped device, with infrastructure in European data centers and GDPR and CSA STAR claims.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Support
- Paid plans advertise 24x7 support by email, chat and Slack, while the documentation directs users to email and a Slack workspace.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Headquarters
- Norento BV lists Vlinderhof 18, 9180 Moerbeke, Belgium; LinkedIn identifies Moerbeke in the Flemish Region as headquarters.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Founded
- TestingBot says it was founded in 2011 to simplify Selenium testing; LinkedIn lists 2012 as the founded year.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- AI testing
- An AI agent can create and execute tests from natural-language instructions, with MCP access for assistants such as Cursor and Claude Code.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- API scope
- The API documents browser/device discovery, team management, tests and builds, insights, storage, webhooks and mobile-app automation endpoints.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Browser coverage
- The platform lists Internet Explorer 8 through 11, Edge, Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Opera across real operating systems.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Chrome extension
- The browser extension lets users launch a remote browser or device session for the page currently open in Chrome or Firefox.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Company history
- TestingBot says it was founded in 2011 to provide a cloud platform for cross-browser and mobile testing.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Company legal name
- The privacy policy identifies Norento BV, trading as TestingBot, as the data controller.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Company size
- LinkedIn reports a company size of 2–10 employees, and Crunchbase lists a 1–10 employee range.Read 15 Oct 2026 · be.linkedin.com
- Data residency
- The company says test data, videos and logs remain on European infrastructure, including Belgium, Germany, Finland and Switzerland.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Documentation
- The help center contains framework guides for Selenium, Playwright, Appium, Cypress and mobile testing, plus API, tunnel, capabilities, FAQ and changelog sections.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Encryption
- The security whitepaper states that data is encrypted at rest with AES-256 and in transit with TLS 1.2 or later.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Frameworks
- TestingBot states that it supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, Espresso, XCUITest and Maestro.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Funding disclosure
- The reviewed Crunchbase profile does not provide a verified funding amount and shows no usable funding-round details.Read 15 Oct 2026 · crunchbase.com
- Limit: device reliability
- One Capterra reviewer reported that paid device sessions failed, while another said some older devices were slow.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Limit: pricing model
- Reviewers complain that monthly subscriptions can be expensive when they only need a few hours of testing or occasional access.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Limit: speed and responsiveness
- Several Capterra reviews report slow manual sessions, laggy feeds, slow interaction or an unintuitive interface.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Limits
- The pricing FAQ says that tests stop running after the monthly testing time is reached until the next billing month or a plan upgrade.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Mobile testing
- Physical iOS and Android devices support manual and automated Appium, Espresso, XCUITest and Maestro testing.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Notable update
- On October 13, 2026, TestingBot announced Tunnel 5.0 with improved reconnection, host allowlists, SSH host-key verification and self-contained downloads.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Ownership and founder
- Crunchbase describes TestingBot as a private, for-profit company and names Jochen Delabie as founder.Read 15 Oct 2026 · crunchbase.com
- Parallel execution
- Tests can run simultaneously across browsers and devices, with concurrency determined by the selected plan.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Praise: coverage and value
- Reviewers praise access to device and browser environments they do not own and sometimes describe pricing as better than competing services.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Praise: ease of use
- Capterra reviewers repeatedly describe TestingBot as easy to set up, quick to understand and useful for testing across many devices.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Public API
- TestingBot exposes a version 1 REST API at api.testingbot.com using JSON and HTTP Basic authentication over HTTPS.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Rating on Capterra
- 3.8 out of 5 from 15 reviews.Read 15 Oct 2026 · capterra.com
- Rating on Chrome Web Store
- 1 out of 5 from 1 rating.Read 15 Oct 2026 · chromewebstore.google.com
- SDKs
- Documentation provides examples or clients for .NET, Ruby, Python, PHP, Java and Node.js, while the site also lists JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, Go and Kotlin support.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Self-hosting
- TestingBot offers private-cloud enterprise deployments but states that on-premises deployment is not currently supported.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Service incident
- The status history records a 90-minute stability incident on September 28, 2026 caused by a hardware problem.Read 15 Oct 2026 · status.testingbot.com
- Testing features
- The platform offers automated, live manual, visual and AI-assisted testing.Read 4 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Tunnel
- TestingBot Tunnel is a free proxy for reaching localhost, staging and private-network sites through an SSH-encrypted channel to a dedicated cloud VM.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Tunnel license
- The tunnel source repository is open source under the MIT license, with Java, standalone, Docker and Maven distribution options.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Tunnel requirements
- The tunnel supports Windows, macOS, Linux and BSD; Java mode needs Java 17+, at least 4 GB RAM and 2 CPU cores, with outbound ports 443 and 22.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Visual testing
- Visual testing compares website or mobile-app screenshots against baselines to identify visual regressions.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
- Web testing
- The service runs Selenium, Playwright, Cypress and Puppeteer tests on Windows, macOS and Linux browser environments.Read 15 Oct 2026 · testingbot.com
Plans and prices
Strong points and limits
Strong points
- Tests run on real browsers and physical mobile devices.
- Supports eight named test frameworks.
- Automated runs can execute in parallel.
- Offers a public REST API and webhooks.
- 14-day trial is listed.
Limits
- Monthly test time limits can stop tests until renewal or upgrade.
- On-premise deployment is not supported.
- Enterprise pricing requires contacting the company.
Who it suits
TestingBot suits teams that need browser and physical-device testing across automated, manual, visual, or AI-assisted workflows. Its framework support, parallel runs, and CI integrations are relevant to teams connecting tests to development pipelines.
TestingBot in depth
Read the full write-up
TestingBot is a cloud service for testing software on real browsers and physical mobile devices. It is a strong fit for teams combining browser and mobile coverage with existing automation frameworks and CI pipelines. Its range of test modes is useful, but plan quotas and the lack of on-premise deployment can rule it out.
Overview
Founded in 2011, TestingBot brings automated, live manual, visual and AI-assisted testing into one cloud grid. The combination lets teams use one service for different kinds of checks across web and mobile, rather than limiting their workflow to browser automation alone. Real iOS and Android devices are included in the paid tiers described below.
Key features
TestingBot supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, Espresso, XCUITest and Maestro. This breadth suits teams already using one of these frameworks, and avoids tying the service to a single test runner. Automated tests can run in parallel, with concurrency controlled in test configuration or a CI pipeline; the available parallel capacity depends on the plan.
Integrations include Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, Bamboo, TeamCity, Travis CI, Jira and Slack. A public REST API and webhooks provide options for custom connections. For organizations with data-handling requirements, TestingBot says it is GDPR-compliant by design and CSA STAR Level 1 registered. Sessions use isolated machines or devices wiped after testing; logs, videos, screenshots and artifacts are stored and processed in EU datacenters, with AES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.2 or later in transit.
Pricing
TestingBot has a free plan and a 14-day trial. The paid plans use different billing structures, so compare the term and testing allowance rather than relying on the entry-price headline alone. Testing time is a consequential limit: when a monthly allowance runs out, tests stop until the next billing month or an upgrade.
Live: €20 a year, billed annually, or €30 month-to-month. It includes unlimited live and visual testing, real iOS and Android devices, and 24x7 email, chat and Slack support. This suits teams primarily doing manual and visual checks; it does not include an automated-minute allowance.
Automated: €50 a year, billed annually, or €70 month-to-month. It adds 1,000 automated minutes per month while retaining unlimited live and visual testing, real devices and 24x7 support. The monthly quota makes it a fit for modest automation workloads, but teams with heavier execution needs may hit the stop-running limit.
Pay As You Go: €60, paid once, a one-time payment for 1,000 testing minutes and one parallel session. At €0.06 per minute, the minutes never expire and cover automated, manual, visual and AI testing. It suits occasional use where a recurring subscription is undesirable, but the single-session limit restricts concurrent work.
Automated Pro: €90 a year, billed annually, or €120 month-to-month. It includes unlimited automated, live and visual testing, real devices and 24x7 support. This is the clearest fit for sustained automation that would outgrow the 1,000-minute monthly allowance on Automated.
Enterprise: custom pricing, with unlimited testing, 10+ parallel tests, single sign-on, priority support and private cloud availability. It is aimed at organizations needing higher concurrency or private-cloud deployment. On-premise deployments are not supported.
Support is listed as 24x7 by email, chat and Slack for Live, Automated and Automated Pro. The listed plan details do not establish that the same support arrangement applies to Pay As You Go.
Platforms
TestingBot covers Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows, web and API testing. Real-device access strengthens the mobile offer, while the browser and desktop platform range serves cross-environment checks. Enterprise private cloud is an option, but organizations requiring an on-premise installation should look elsewhere.
Who it's for
TestingBot is best for software teams that need both browser and mobile testing, want to retain established frameworks, and value CI integration and parallel execution. Live fits manual and visual testing; Automated is better for a smaller recurring automation workload; Automated Pro removes the stated monthly automated-time cap. Teams that need a fixed number of parallel sessions at lower cost, or need on-premise hosting, should weigh those constraints before committing.
Pros and cons
Pro: Four testing modes, broad framework support and real iOS and Android devices let teams cover varied workflows in one service.
Pro: Named CI, issue-tracking and messaging integrations, plus an API and webhooks, support integration with existing delivery workflows.
Pro: EU data processing and storage, stated encryption standards, and isolated, wiped test environments address concrete security concerns.
Con: Automated minutes are capped at 1,000 per month on Automated, and tests stop when a monthly allowance is exhausted.
Con: Pay As You Go is limited to one parallel session, which may slow teams that need concurrent runs.
Con: Private cloud is available for Enterprise, but on-premise deployment is not.
Alternatives
CloudQA may suit teams wanting a free starting point for automated test creation and local execution, unlimited API tests, seven days of history and Chrome coverage.
Teams centered on visual testing can consider Percy, whose Desktop plan includes 10,000 screenshots per month for $199 a month, billed annually, or Desktop & Mobile with 25,000 screenshots per month for $599 a month, billed annually. For browser checks across a freemium offering, Browserling has a Starter plan at $9 a month billed annually, with Windows 10, Chrome and Edge; its page also shows $12.
Happo is another visual-testing option: its free plan includes 5,000 snapshots per month, Chrome, and visual and accessibility testing, with no credit card or time limit. Teams looking for a device-farm platform from an EPAM-created product may consider Mobitru. Testsigma is a paid alternative with a free plan and a Test Management Pro price of $14 a month, stated as $14 per user per month.
BrowserStack Automate is a paid option for teams that do not need a free plan; its Chrome plan is $59 a month, billed annually, for one parallel test. For broader category browsing, see Browser Testing Software, Device Farm Software, Mobile App Testing Software and Browser Automation Tools.
Verdict
Choose TestingBot if your team needs a shared cloud grid for browser and real-device testing, multiple test modes, and integration with an existing framework and CI pipeline. Its strongest reason to buy is that breadth; its main reasons to look elsewhere are the monthly testing-time ceiling on Automated and the absence of on-premise deployment.
Verdict
TestingBot combines several test modes with real-device access, framework support, and CI integrations. Check the monthly testing-time allowance and deployment options, particularly if on-premise hosting is required.
Where Specifiction places it
- Device Farm Software#4 of 268.5
- Testing And Qa#6 of 338.7
- Browser Automation Tools#13 of 638.6
- Mobile Device Testing Software#4 of 188.5
- Automated Testing#11 of 348.5
- Mobile App Testing Software#11 of 328.5
- Browser Testing Software#12 of 348.5