Abstrackr vs LitMap

Abstrackr is a free web tool for screening citations in systematic reviews. It supports solo work, blinded team screening, pilot rounds, and conflict resolution. After about 100 labels, machine learning ranks remaining citations by predicted relevance. A live PRISMA flow table records screening thresholds, resolved conflicts, exclusion reasons by tag, and analysis of the model’s stop point. Citations can be imported from PubMed, Scopus, or Embase, or uploaded as RIS and CSV files. The service deduplicates records by DOI and PMID and can merge remaining near-duplicates. Results export as CSV or RIS, with a full JSONL download for DuckDB queries. Blinding starts enabled, and changes are logged with user, reason, timestamp, and project snapshots. Member and Leader roles have no stated team-size limit, while reminders arrive 7, 4, and 1 day before deadlines. No installation is needed, and the site directs methodology questions to its community forum.

LitMap is a web tool for analyzing papers and organizing a literature review. Users upload PDFs, and the service extracts claims, methods, and findings. AI extraction can also identify definitions and limitations, with editable results. Papers are clustered by semantic similarity on a visual canvas that users can rearrange. LitMap highlights disagreements with side-by-side quotations and lets users mark them resolved or unresolved. Its gap finder identifies missing populations, methods, or timeframes. Users can arrange papers and themes into an outline, then export organized notes with citations as Markdown, CSV, or JSON. LitMap does not write literature-review prose or paraphrase sources. The site says it works offline, keeps data in the browser, and requires no account. It is labeled beta. The Free plan costs nothing and allows five projects with 50 papers per project; Student costs €5 a month, and Academic costs €25 a month.