accessio-scan vs AccessLint
accessio-scan
github.comAccessLint
accesslint.comSide by side
| Figure | accessio-scan | AccessLint |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | $19/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 3 |
| Spec score · Website Accessibility Tools | 7.1 (#122) | 9.0 (#8) |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Security | The Chromium sandbox is enabled by default, and the README warns against scanning untrusted URLs from a privileged network. | The privacy policy states that site traffic uses TLS, sensitive data is encrypted at rest, and payment card numbers are handled by Stripe and never reach AccessLint servers. |
Plans
In their own words
accessio-scan
accessio-scan has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
AccessLint
AccessLint checks accessibility during development, on pull requests, and on live sites. Its WCAG 2.2 engine has 95 rules and a stated 53ms median audit across 5,000 real-world sites. Pull-request reviews inspect changed files and leave inline comments with the relevant rule and a suggested correction, but do not fail builds or block merges. Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro, run asynchronously, and also do not synchronously fail builds. Saved user journeys can run daily, with email alerts for new violations or changes against a baseline. The toolkit provides checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. Starter and Pro include shareable read-only evidence reports with before-and-after screenshots of affected elements. Free covers public-repository pull-request reviews, one daily monitored flow, and violation trends. Starter costs $19 a month or $190 a year; Pro costs $349 a month or $3,490 a year. AccessLint says automated checks alone cannot make a site compliant.