AccessLint vs Ariada
AccessLint
accesslint.com
Ariada
ariada.orgSide by side
| Figure | AccessLint | Ariada |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $19/mo | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 3 | 1 |
| Spec score · Accessibility Testing Software | 9.0 (#10) | 8.2 (#58) |
| Automated scans | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | The a11y agent is a Chrome extension that audits pages in real time and gives AI-generated remediation suggestions in Chrome’s side panel. | The Chrome side panel runs a multi-domain compliance scan on the active tab locally, covering accessibility, privacy, security, AI-readiness, structured data, and sustainability. |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | The toolkit provides accessibility checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. | The package catalog lists test adapters for Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Playwright, and Cypress. |
| Maker | The privacy policy identifies the maker as AccessLint, LLC and lists its address in Albany, New York, United States. | The site identifies Alexander Brichkin of Agonist Development AB in Sweden as lead maintainer. |
| Privacy | AccessLint says it does not sell personal information or share it for advertising, and says it never asks for or stores site passwords. | The maker says the site has no analytics or tracking, and the GitHub Actions workflow requires no Ariada account or API key. |
| Remediation guidance | Yes | Yes |
| Support | AccessLint directs users who cannot find an answer in Help to email [email protected]. | Accessibility feedback can be sent to [email protected]; the maker aims to acknowledge reports within five business days and publish a remediation track within 14 business days. |
| WCAG coverage | wcag 2.2 | wcag 2.2 |
Plans
In their own words
AccessLint
AccessLint checks accessibility during development, on pull requests, and on live sites. Its WCAG 2.2 engine has 95 rules and a stated 53ms median audit across 5,000 real-world sites. Pull-request reviews inspect changed files and leave inline comments with the relevant rule and a suggested correction, but do not fail builds or block merges. Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro, run asynchronously, and also do not synchronously fail builds. Saved user journeys can run daily, with email alerts for new violations or changes against a baseline. The toolkit provides checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. Starter and Pro include shareable read-only evidence reports with before-and-after screenshots of affected elements. Free covers public-repository pull-request reviews, one daily monitored flow, and violation trends. Starter costs $19 a month or $190 a year; Pro costs $349 a month or $3,490 a year. AccessLint says automated checks alone cannot make a site compliant.