AccessLint vs DARTSuite
AccessLint
accesslint.comDARTSuite
dartsuite.comSide by side
| Figure | AccessLint | DARTSuite |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $19/mo | $59/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Spec score · Accessibility Testing Software | 9.0 (#10) | 8.6 (#24) |
| Automated scans | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | The a11y agent is a Chrome extension that audits pages in real time and gives AI-generated remediation suggestions in Chrome’s side panel. | Yes |
| Compliance limitation | AccessLint says it can help demonstrate an accessibility process but does not make a site compliant, and no automated tool can do so. | DARTSuite states that no software makes an organization compliant on its own; compliance requires testing, fixing, verifying, maintaining WCAG 2.1 AA conformance, and responding to accommodation requests. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | The toolkit provides accessibility checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. | DARTSuite says its API connects accessibility findings, status, and evidence with ticketing, project management, and reporting tools; named integrations are not listed on the opened page. |
| Product | AccessLint checks apps during development, on pull requests, and on live sites to catch accessibility issues. | DARTSuite describes itself as a digital accessibility system for ADA Title II compliance across websites, apps, PDFs, and other digital assets. |
| Remediation guidance | Yes | Findings can include screenshots, code-level remediation guidance, XPath and code snippets, reproduction steps, test environments, and revision history. |
| Paid from | 19 | 59 |
| Support | AccessLint directs users who cannot find an answer in Help to email [email protected]. | The homepage describes DARTDesk as a searchable knowledge base with remediation guidance and expert support when articles do not answer a question. |
Plans
DARTSuite
- StarterFree
- Professional$59 a month
- Agency$599 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
AccessLint
AccessLint checks accessibility during development, on pull requests, and on live sites. Its WCAG 2.2 engine has 95 rules and a stated 53ms median audit across 5,000 real-world sites. Pull-request reviews inspect changed files and leave inline comments with the relevant rule and a suggested correction, but do not fail builds or block merges. Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro, run asynchronously, and also do not synchronously fail builds. Saved user journeys can run daily, with email alerts for new violations or changes against a baseline. The toolkit provides checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. Starter and Pro include shareable read-only evidence reports with before-and-after screenshots of affected elements. Free covers public-repository pull-request reviews, one daily monitored flow, and violation trends. Starter costs $19 a month or $190 a year; Pro costs $349 a month or $3,490 a year. AccessLint says automated checks alone cannot make a site compliant.