AccessLint vs Labrador
AccessLint
accesslint.comLabrador
testwithlabrador.comSide by side
| Figure | AccessLint | Labrador |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $19/mo | $30/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Spec score · Accessibility Testing Software | 9.0 (#10) | 8.4 (#35) |
| Automated scans | Yes | No |
| Browser extension | The a11y agent is a Chrome extension that audits pages in real time and gives AI-generated remediation suggestions in Chrome’s side panel. | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Remediation guidance | Yes | The Chrome extension captures page HTML for contextual remediation suggestions powered by Claude Opus 5.5, which users can review and edit. |
| Security | The privacy policy states that site traffic uses TLS, sensitive data is encrypted at rest, and payment card numbers are handled by Stripe and never reach AccessLint servers. | The service states that connections use TLS and stored data is encrypted with AES-256; optional authenticator-based two-factor authentication is available. |
| Support | AccessLint directs users who cannot find an answer in Help to email [email protected]. | The pricing page says weekday live chat is available from 9am–5pm GMT and EDT, and users can book a one-to-one demo. |
| WCAG coverage | wcag 2.2 | wcag 2.2 |
Plans
In their own words
AccessLint
AccessLint checks accessibility during development, on pull requests, and on live sites. Its WCAG 2.2 engine has 95 rules and a stated 53ms median audit across 5,000 real-world sites. Pull-request reviews inspect changed files and leave inline comments with the relevant rule and a suggested correction, but do not fail builds or block merges. Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro, run asynchronously, and also do not synchronously fail builds. Saved user journeys can run daily, with email alerts for new violations or changes against a baseline. The toolkit provides checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. Starter and Pro include shareable read-only evidence reports with before-and-after screenshots of affected elements. Free covers public-repository pull-request reviews, one daily monitored flow, and violation trends. Starter costs $19 a month or $190 a year; Pro costs $349 a month or $3,490 a year. AccessLint says automated checks alone cannot make a site compliant.
Labrador
Labrador has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.