AccessLint vs Warder
AccessLint
accesslint.comWarder
warder.appSide by side
| Figure | AccessLint | Warder |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $19/mo | $12/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Spec score · Accessibility Testing Software | 9.0 (#10) | 8.1 (#68) |
| Automated scans | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | The toolkit provides accessibility checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. | Alerts can be routed through email, Slack, or webhooks by tier, and the homepage describes syncing findings into Asana where configured. |
| Maker | The privacy policy identifies the maker as AccessLint, LLC and lists its address in Albany, New York, United States. | Warder says it is designed, built, and maintained by a single developer. |
| Product | AccessLint checks apps during development, on pull requests, and on live sites to catch accessibility issues. | Warder is accessibility monitoring software that runs axe-core scans, tracks trends, and helps teams triage issues and report progress. |
| Remediation guidance | Yes | Yes |
| Support | AccessLint directs users who cannot find an answer in Help to email [email protected]. | Warder invites users to contact its developer with bugs, workflow gaps, or feature ideas. |
| WCAG coverage | wcag 2.2 | wcag 2.1 |
Plans
In their own words
AccessLint
AccessLint checks accessibility during development, on pull requests, and on live sites. Its WCAG 2.2 engine has 95 rules and a stated 53ms median audit across 5,000 real-world sites. Pull-request reviews inspect changed files and leave inline comments with the relevant rule and a suggested correction, but do not fail builds or block merges. Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro, run asynchronously, and also do not synchronously fail builds. Saved user journeys can run daily, with email alerts for new violations or changes against a baseline. The toolkit provides checks for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook, while pull-request reviews use a GitHub App. Starter and Pro include shareable read-only evidence reports with before-and-after screenshots of affected elements. Free covers public-repository pull-request reviews, one daily monitored flow, and violation trends. Starter costs $19 a month or $190 a year; Pro costs $349 a month or $3,490 a year. AccessLint says automated checks alone cannot make a site compliant.