Adlega vs Phocas
Adlega
adlega.com
Phocas
phocassoftware.comSide by side
| Figure | Adlega | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $41/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Spec score · Financial Planning & Analysis Software | 8.6 (#7) | 7.2 (#63) |
| Integrations | The Growth plan lists Google Analytics, Google Ads, Stripe and Chargebee; Founder includes one actuals-sync integration. | Phocas says it supports integrations with more than 200 data sources, including ERP systems and sources such as CRM, sales, inventory, purchasing and spreadsheets. |
| What it does | Adlega is a web-based SaaS financial-planning platform that turns business assumptions into connected 36-month forecasts. | Phocas is a SaaS business intelligence and financial planning and analysis platform for wholesale distribution, manufacturing and retail businesses. |
Plans
In their own words
Adlega
Adlega is web-based financial planning and forecasting software for SaaS companies. It builds a connected 36-month operating model spanning MRR, costs, cash, runway, profit and loss, and KPI reporting. The model has more than 40 drivers, with downstream figures changing when an assumption is adjusted. Its MRR waterfall tracks new, expansion, contraction, and churned revenue by month. Users can model hiring by role, salary, and start date, compare scenarios, and use goal seek to identify inputs for a target. The AI CFO can create forecasts from plain-language descriptions and answer questions using model data, with responses traceable to drivers and formulas. Founder includes one actuals-sync integration; Growth lists Google Analytics, Google Ads, Stripe, and Chargebee. Adlega offers a free plan with one model, core forecasts, MRR and runway, 15 Adlega Tokens per month, and a read-only share link. Founder is $41 a month, billed annually at 490 USD per year; Growth is $124 a month, billed annually at 1,490 USD per year. AI outputs may be inaccurate and are informational, not professional advice.