AllDup vs rmlint
| AllDup | rmlint | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Platform coverage | windows | cross-platform |
| Scan locations | local drives and storage media; network paths and shares; archive files including ZIP, RAR, and 7Z | Local filesystem paths, mounted volumes, and file lists supplied through standard input |
| Match methods | file content; image similarity; sound similarity; filename; file size; modification or creation date; file attributes; hard links; video or sound duration | File hashes, exact byte-by-byte comparison, and optional basename or extension matching |
| File preview | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic selection | Yes | Yes |
| Recycle Bin / Trash | Yes | No |
| Folder exclusions | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Duplicate File Finders. On Specifiction, rmlint scores higher on our published basis.