ALMS vs Open edX
ALMS
advancity.com.tr
Open edX
openedx.orgSide by side
| Figure | ALMS | Open edX |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | Yes | Yes |
| Android | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 1 |
| Spec score · Learning Management Systems | 6.6 (#110) | 8.7 (#8) |
| Assessments | Its online exam system supports question banks with varied question types, exam monitoring, question cancellations, and makeup exams. | The platform includes native editors for formative and summative assessments, including question types and tools for coding, engineering, and other STEM content. |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| SSO support | Yes | Yes |
| Support | The maker describes continuous support and says the system shares the workload of distance education support teams. | The site directs organizations seeking implementation help to service partners who can customize, host, and manage a distribution. |
Plans
In their own words
Open edX
Open edX is an open-source platform for teaching and learning, combining course authoring tools with a learner-facing learning management system. Open edX Studio supports creating, managing, reusing and remixing course content. Aspects analytics turns enrollment, learner progress, assessment performance, forum activity and video engagement into metrics and visualizations. The platform supports LTI 1.3 integrations and extensible course components called XBlocks. Listed sign-in integrations include SAML and OAuth 2.0 providers such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft and LinkedIn. Open edX supports assessments, certificates, APIs and mobile apps, and can be self-hosted. Universities, governments, nongovernmental organizations and enterprises use the platform. Institutions control their content, learner data, hosting environment and governance policies. The software has no license fees, but an organization operating an instance must arrange hosting, infrastructure, maintenance, support and customization. Organizations can seek implementation help from service partners. The project began in 2012 and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Its security process directs vulnerability reports to its Security Working Group and does not offer bug bounties.