Amazon AppSync vs Sangria
Amazon AppSync
aws.amazon.comSangria
sangria-graphql.github.ioSide by side
| Figure | Amazon AppSync | Sangria |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1/mo | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 0 |
| Spec score · GraphQL Tools | 7.8 (#10) | 6.8 (#22) |
| Authentication | Built-in authorization modes include API keys, OIDC, Amazon Cognito, IAM, and Lambda authorizers. | The documentation says Sangria does not provide explicit security primitives and demonstrates implementing authentication and authorization through application context, resolvers, middleware, and field tags. |
| Intended users | AWS describes AppSync as suitable for connecting application developers to data and building experiences such as AI gateways, federated APIs, and real-time applications. | The documentation presents Sangria as a library for Scala developers building GraphQL servers and endpoints. |
| Purpose | AWS AppSync connects applications to events, data, and AI models through GraphQL and pub/sub APIs. | Sangria is a Scala implementation of GraphQL. |
| Support | AWS offers support tailored to needs ranging from startups to enterprise level through its contact-an-expert option. | The community page directs users to Stack Overflow for help and Gitter for general discussion. |
Plans
In their own words
Amazon AppSync
Amazon AppSync has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
Sangria
Sangria has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.