AmorphousDiskMark vs GitHub CodeQL
AmorphousDiskMark
github.com
GitHub CodeQL
codeql.github.comSide by side
| Figure | AmorphousDiskMark | GitHub CodeQL |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | $30/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | — | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 5 |
| Spec score · Disk Benchmark Software | 7.9 (#8) | 8.3 (#4) |
| Purpose | AmorphousDiskMark measures storage read/write performance in MB/s and IOPS. | CodeQL is a language and toolchain for code analysis that treats code as data. |
Plans
GitHub CodeQL
- Free for research and open sourceFree
- GitHub Code Security$30 a month
- CodeQL for open source and researchFree
- GitHub Code Security$30 a month
- GitHub Free with CodeQL code scanningPrice not published
In their own words
AmorphousDiskMark
AmorphousDiskMark is a free, open-source macOS utility for measuring storage read and write performance. It reports scores in megabytes per second or IOPS, with both units available in result tooltips. Sequential measurements use 1 MiB blocks, while random measurements use 4 KiB blocks; either type can run at queue depths from 1 through 1024. You can select random or zero test data, choose test sizes from 16 MiB to 64 GiB, and set intervals from 0 seconds to 10 minutes. Results can be copied as plain text, and the app can save a screenshot of its window. The product page lists macOS 10.9.5 or later, and the App Store describes it as Mac-only. The maker says an internet connection is unnecessary after downloading. The GitHub repository identifies an MIT license. The listed plan is free. Repeating read/write measurements may shorten storage-device lifespan.
GitHub CodeQL
GitHub CodeQL has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.