Angos vs ZenoRegistry
Angos
angos.dev
ZenoRegistry
citiumsoftware.comSide by side
| Figure | Angos | ZenoRegistry |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 1 |
| Spec score · Container Registries | 8.0 (#10) | 6.8 (#46) |
| Access control | CEL policies and optional webhooks control push, pull, and delete access per repository. | It provides pull, push, and admin roles, with JWT scopes checked per repository and action on OCI requests. |
| Integrations | The project README lists Docker Compose and Kubernetes deployment guides, GitHub Actions OIDC setup, and Trivy or Grype scanning. | The page says Argo CD and Flux can pull from ZenoRegistry and that it ships as a core service in the ZenoKube sovereign cloud platform. |
| Operations | Angos requires no database or lock service, supports replicas sharing storage, and runs garbage collection, scrub, and prune while serving. | It includes a dependency-free health endpoint, graceful shutdown, structured JSON logs, automatic PostgreSQL migrations, and Kubernetes deployment guidance. |
Plans
In their own words
ZenoRegistry
ZenoRegistry has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.