App Radar vs ASOScan
App Radar
splitmetrics.comASOScan
asoscan.comSide by side
| Figure | App Radar | ASOScan |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $57.50/mo | $15/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 7 | 5 |
| Spec score · App Store Optimization Software | 8.1 (#9) | 7.9 (#16) |
| Integrations | The pricing page lists Google Play Console, App Store Connect, Slack, custom account exports compatible with BI tools and API access. | Users can connect Apple App Store Connect and Google Play Console for reviews, replies and listing data; Google Ads campaign integration is also described in the privacy policy. |
| Purpose | App Radar is an app store optimization platform that combines keyword intelligence, metadata management, competitor research and review management across the App Store and Google Play. | ASOScan is an App Store Optimization platform for keyword research, metadata, rank tracking, competitor intelligence, reviews and reporting across the App Store and Google Play. |
| Security | The product page states GDPR compliance, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification. | The privacy policy says passwords are stored as salted bcrypt hashes, connections use TLS, database backups are encrypted at rest and production access requires SSH keys. |
| Support | The plans include Help Center documentation and support, while the Scale plan adds priority support, personalized onboarding, an account manager and a Slack channel. | The maker lists [email protected] for product questions and says privacy inquiries are answered within 30 days, usually faster. |
Plans
App Radar
- Essentials Pack$69 a month
- Growth Pack$169 a month
- Scale Pack$299 a month
- Essentials Pack$690 a year
- Growth Pack$1,690 a year
- Scale Pack$2,990 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
ASOScan
- Solo$15 a month
- Pro$59 a month
- Business$149 a month
- Agency$299 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
App Radar
App Radar has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.