Appcircle vs CruiseControl.NET
Appcircle
appcircle.ioCruiseControl.NET
ccnet.github.ioSide by side
| Figure | Appcircle | CruiseControl.NET |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | — |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | Yes | — |
| Android | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Spec score · Continuous Integration Software | 8.4 (#12) | 7.8 (#32) |
| Deployment | Self-hosted deployments support Docker, Podman, Kubernetes, and OpenShift, and can keep source code, signing identities, and build artifacts within the customer's network. | The service application runs integrations as a Windows service without requiring a user to remain logged in on the server. |
| Purpose | Its stated mission is to simplify and automate mobile development workflows for teams of all sizes. | CruiseControl.NET is an open-source automated continuous integration server implemented using the .NET Framework. |
| Security | Appcircle says source code is fetched only during builds, build agents are isolated temporary virtual machines, and repository access uses read-only tokens. | Server security supports authorization, authentication, and auditing, and the documentation says security is off by default unless configured in ccnet.config. |
Plans
In their own words
CruiseControl.NET
CruiseControl.NET has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.