arXiv vs EconLit

arXiv is a curated research-sharing platform and open-access archive for scholarly articles, founded in 1991. It hosts more than three million articles across eight subject areas: physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Readers can search and retrieve full text, use advanced search, and explore work across those fields. arXiv supports submission, compilation, production, distribution, curation, and preservation, and provides public API access with usage documentation. RSS 2.0 and ATOM feeds for active subject areas update daily, and users can receive daily email listings of new abstracts. Registered authors can submit without fees, though some new authors or category submissions may need an endorsement. Submissions are moderated for topical relevance and scholarly value but are not peer-reviewed. Text submissions may use LaTeX variants, PDF, or HTML with image files; scanned documents are not accepted. Each version, including a rejected submission, is treated as part of the scientific record and may not be removed.

EconLit is the American Economic Association’s bibliographic database for economics literature. It covers peer-reviewed journal articles, working papers, PhD dissertations, books, book reviews, and articles in collective volumes. The database contains over 2 million records, covers literature published over the last 140 years, and is updated weekly. Searchable record fields can include title, author, affiliation, publication details, document type, keywords, subject classifications, named persons, and geographic descriptors. Its subject descriptors follow the Journal of Economic Literature classification system, using four-digit codes. Institutional subscriptions are available through EBSCO, ProQuest, and Ovid, which provide the same data through different interfaces. Full-text links depend on library holdings; EconLit with Full Text is available only through EBSCO. AEA members have courtesy access to bibliographic records, but that service has no full-text links and may be phased out. Institutional pricing is supplied by providers; EBSCO offers a trial request without stating its duration.