arXiv vs ResearchRabbit

arXiv is a curated research-sharing platform and open-access archive for scholarly articles, founded in 1991. It hosts more than three million articles across eight subject areas: physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Readers can search and retrieve full text, use advanced search, and explore work across those fields. arXiv supports submission, compilation, production, distribution, curation, and preservation, and provides public API access with usage documentation. RSS 2.0 and ATOM feeds for active subject areas update daily, and users can receive daily email listings of new abstracts. Registered authors can submit without fees, though some new authors or category submissions may need an endorsement. Submissions are moderated for topical relevance and scholarly value but are not peer-reviewed. Text submissions may use LaTeX variants, PDF, or HTML with image files; scanned documents are not accepted. Each version, including a rejected submission, is treated as part of the scientific record and may not be removed.

ResearchRabbit is a web service for discovering research related to papers users select. It analyzes those papers and recommends connected work, with interactive maps showing links among papers, authors and concepts. Its recommendations adapt to reading patterns and research interests. The Free plan costs nothing and provides unlimited searches across more than 310 million articles, an unlimited library and collections, sharing, core search settings and up to 50 seed articles. ResearchRabbit+ raises the seed limit to 300 and adds advanced search controls, multiple projects, Signals alerts and faster support responses. Its annual plan costs $10 a year (billed per month, Annual plan); the monthly plan costs $12.50 a month (billed per month, Monthly plan). Users can import selected articles from Zotero collections and export articles as BibTeX. ResearchRabbit is aimed at researchers and students, and does not provide screening workflows, full-text management or systematic review tools.