AT Protocol vs bundle.social
AT Protocol
atproto.combundle.social
bundle.socialSide by side
| Figure | AT Protocol | bundle.social |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | $100/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| iOS | Yes | — |
| Android | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 0 | 4 |
| Spec score · Social Media APIs | 8.0 (#6) | 8.2 (#5) |
| Authentication | Applications can use OAuth, while single-purpose apps such as bots or command-line tools may use password authentication. | The service uses server-to-server API key authentication and handles social account OAuth connection, token storage, and refresh. |
| Media | Blobs include images, video, audio, or other files, and are stored separately from records. | The service supports uploading assets once and reusing upload IDs across posts on different platforms. |
Plans
bundle.social
- FreeFree
- Pro$100 a month
- Business$400 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
AT Protocol
AT Protocol has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
bundle.social
bundle.social has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.