Autolab vs Questionmark
Autolab
autolabproject.com
Questionmark
questionmark.comSide by side
| Figure | Autolab | Questionmark |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| iOS | — | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 2 |
| Spec score · Automated Grading Software | 8.0 (#16) | 8.3 (#10) |
| Integrations | Autolab supports LTI Advantage course linking for roster syncing, with integration features built mainly for Canvas; support for other platforms such as Moodle is untested. | Supported interoperability standards include SCORM, LTI, xAPI and AICC. |
| Support | The project invites schools and organizations to contact its core developers by email for help; it says servers may be provided for free on a case-by-case basis. | Questionmark advertises 24/7 support and support through account-management and technical-support teams by email and telephone for proctoring services. |
| System requirements | The installation guide says machines with less than 2 GB of RAM may have issues installing the sassc gem. | Its record-and-review proctoring specification requires Chrome plus a third-party extension on Windows 7+ or macOS 10.11+, with 2 GB RAM and 250 MB free disk space. |
Plans
In their own words
Autolab
Autolab has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
Questionmark
Questionmark has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.