AutomaDocs vs Docny

AutomaDocs generates documentation from GitHub repositories and updates it when code changes are pushed. It can produce README files, API references, function notes, architecture overviews, and getting-started guides. An AI chat interface answers plain-language codebase questions and cites related files and functions. JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python receive deep Tree-sitter parsing, while Claude AI can analyze other languages directly. GitHub OAuth and webhooks provide repository connections, and documentation can be accessed by Claude Code and Cursor through MCP. Users may edit generated pages; the service says those edits are preserved and merged with later AI updates. Health scores show the share of functions with documentation, with 80% or higher marked green and below 40% red. The hosted service has a free plan for one repository and 50 monthly chat messages. Pro costs $39 a month, billed annually at $470 per year. Self-hosting uses Docker Compose and setup scripts.

Docny is a hosted documentation CMS for developer teams, combining authoring, publishing, hosting and analytics. Content can be written in a WYSIWYG block editor or code-first MDX. Guardian AI scans repositories, URLs, code comments and READMEs to create structured documentation and identify drift. API references support OpenAPI 3.1 and Swagger 2.0, with interactive explorers and re-rendering when linked specifications change. Managed hosting includes SSL, global CDN delivery, custom domains, versioning and one-click publishing. Teams get real-time cursors, inline comments and suggestion resolution, while published sites can include an AI assistant for reader questions. Analytics show popular pages, searches, traffic trends and drop-off points. Integrations include GitHub, Discord, Jira, Algolia, Slack, Notion, Intercom and Linear, plus a public API. Hobby costs £0/mo for one project; Pro costs £45/mo and adds unlimited projects and collaboration features.