Awardmatic vs OpenWater

Awardmatic has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

OpenWater manages application and review workflows for abstracts, awards, scholarships, fellowships, and grants. Organizations can create submission forms with conditional logic and accept attachments in nearly any type, size, or format. Submissions can be routed to multiple reviewers, with scores collected in a dashboard and optional double-blind judging. Rubrics and reviewer collaboration support scoring, while an applicant portal and workflow automation cover other stages of the process. Users can configure dashboards and export reports in multiple file formats, and the platform can collect payments. OpenWater lists Android, iOS, and web access; mobile-responsive submission pages and its mobile app support applicants and team administrators. Security options include SSO, encryption, two-factor authentication, CAPTCHA, and password requirements, with GDPR-related consent and deletion options. It integrates with more than 65 AMS, CRM, directory, and payment systems, including iMIS, Salesforce, Higher Logic, Stripe, and PayPal. The paid subscription uses a custom quote based on usage needs, functionality, and backend user count. OpenWater does not support recommendation requests directly within the platform.