AWS CloudFormation vs kube-score

AWS CloudFormation models, provisions, and manages related AWS and third-party resources as infrastructure as code. YAML or JSON templates define AWS resources and their properties. StackSets deploy a common set of resources across multiple AWS accounts and Regions; Change Sets preview proposed stack updates, including possible deletion or replacement, and Drift Detection tracks changes made outside the service. For authoring, AWS CDK supports TypeScript, Python, Java, and .NET, while AWS SAM offers shorthand YAML for serverless resources that is converted during deployment. The CloudFormation Registry supports third-party resources and modules, and stacks can be updated from remote Git repositories. The service is available through API, Linux, macOS, web, and Windows, and manages state. CloudFormation itself has a free plan, with no additional charge for AWS and Alexa resource providers, but created AWS resources are billed at their standard rates. Third-party provider and custom hook operations may also incur charges. Access can be managed with IAM, and CloudTrail logs API calls.

kube-score statically analyzes Kubernetes object definitions and recommends changes intended to improve application security and resilience. Its checks cover container limits, NetworkPolicy targeting, PodDisruptionBudget, Pod anti-affinity, container probes, security context, and stable APIs. Optional checks include matching resource requests and limits, container ports, and seccomp profile configuration. You can configure tests to be ignored or enabled globally or for individual objects. kube-score works with Helm, Kustomize, static YAML files, Docker, and resources retrieved from a Kubernetes cluster. Its browser demo accepts Kubernetes YAML or JSON and, according to the maker, processes it in the browser without sending data to a server. Local options include prebuilt binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows, along with Docker, Homebrew, and Kubernetes Krew. Output formats include human-readable, JSON, CI, and SARIF. In CI/CD, critical errors return exit code 1; warnings can also be set as the exit threshold. The free, MIT-licensed project recommends analyzing all applications deployed to the same namespace together. Building from source requires Go 1.21 or later.