Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

AWS CodeCommit vs Codeberg

AWS CodeCommit

aws.amazon.com

Codeberg

codeberg.org

Side by side

FigureAWS CodeCommitCodeberg
Price fromFreeFree
Free planYesYes
Free trial——
Open source——
WebYesYes
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
APIYes—
Self-hosted—Yes
Plans published11
Spec score · Git Hosting Services8.3 (#9)8.3 (#10)
IntegrationsCodeCommit works with development environment plugins, CI/CD systems, graphical clients, and Amazon SNS notifications.Official integration documentation covers Keycloak, LiberaPay, Matrix, and Read the Docs.
PurposeCodeCommit is a managed service for hosting private Git repositories and collaborating on code.Codeberg is a democratic, community-driven, non-profit software development platform operated by Codeberg e.V. and centered on a Forgejo-based software forge.

Plans

AWS CodeCommit

  • AWS CodeCommitFree

AWS CodeCommit pricing →

Codeberg

  • Free/libre software projectsFree

Codeberg pricing →

In their own words

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Visit aws.amazon.com

Codeberg

Codeberg is a free, community-driven software development platform operated by Codeberg e.V. and built around the Forgejo software forge. Repositories include Git source control, issue tracking, and wikis. Codeberg Pages can publish static websites on a codeberg.page address or custom domain; CI/CD options include a Woodpecker instance and Forgejo Actions. Weblate is available for software localization, and documented integrations include Keycloak, LiberaPay, Matrix, and Read the Docs. Users can enable two-factor authentication, and Codeberg publishes SSH host fingerprints for server verification. Its free plan costs nothing and lists 750 MiB of Git storage, 1.5 GiB for packages, LFS, and attachments, 100 MiB of private or personal content, and 100 repositories. The default repository limit is 100 for users and organizations, with increases requestable. Codeberg is intended for free/libre software projects and may reject uses that do not contribute to that purpose or abuse its infrastructure. It recommends self-hosting Forgejo as an alternative deployment option.

Visit codeberg.org