AWS CodeCommit vs Cursor Origin
AWS CodeCommit
aws.amazon.comCursor Origin
cursor.comSide by side
| Figure | AWS CodeCommit | Cursor Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 8 |
| Spec score · Git Hosting Services | 8.3 (#9) | 8.2 (#13) |
| Availability | AWS CodeCommit is no longer available to new customers; existing customers can continue to use it as normal. | Origin is released in early beta, and access is opening in stages. |
| Integrations | CodeCommit works with development environment plugins, CI/CD systems, graphical clients, and Amazon SNS notifications. | Origin supports GitHub repository mirroring and Origin Apps; Cursor says Vercel, Depot, and Buildkite integrations are available. |
Plans
Cursor Origin
- Pro$20 a month
- Teams Standard$40 a month
- Teams Premium$120 a month
- Teams$40 a month
- Pro+$60 a month
- Ultra$200 a month
- Start (India only)₹649 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
Cursor Origin
Cursor Origin has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.