AWS CodeCommit vs GitForge
AWS CodeCommit
aws.amazon.com
GitForge
git-forge.devSide by side
| Figure | AWS CodeCommit | GitForge |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | $12/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Spec score · Git Hosting Services | 8.3 (#9) | 7.9 (#21) |
| Intended users | AWS describes CodeCommit as designed for software developers and also suitable for people needing a managed versioned store, including IT administrators and web designers. | The Free plan is described as being for individuals and small projects, while Pro is aimed at growing teams and Enterprise at organizations with governance and scale needs. |
| Purpose | CodeCommit is a managed service for hosting private Git repositories and collaborating on code. | GitForge hosts Git repositories in storage the customer already owns. |
Plans
In their own words
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.