Axelium vs Sysrev
Axelium
axelium.aiSysrev
sysrev.comSide by side
| Figure | Axelium | Sysrev |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $29/mo | $50/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 5 | 4 |
| Spec score · AI Literature Review Software | 8.3 (#8) | 8.4 (#7) |
| Integrations | It lists reference imports from EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, Embase, and Web of Science; database sources include PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, EuropePMC, OpenAlex, CENTRAL, MAUDE, and ERIC. | External records can be imported through RIS or BibTeX files, and Zotero-compatible files can be handled through the Zotero translator. |
| Support | The contact page provides [email protected] for existing users and says the team replies within 1–2 business days. | Users can submit an in-project issue report or email [email protected]. |
Plans
Axelium
- FreeFree
- Researcher$29 a month
- Professional$79 a month
- Team$266 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
Axelium
Axelium is an AI-assisted platform for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, spanning evidence search, screening, analysis, reporting, and living reviews. Its 11 stages include protocol, search, screening, full-text review, extraction, RoB 2.0, GRADE, statistics, network meta-analysis, reporting, and living reviews. The maker says AI extracts structured values while deterministic code calculates statistics, and data points link to snippets in original PDFs. Listed methods include pairwise and network synthesis, Cochrane RoB 2.0, GRADE certainty ratings, CERQual, and PRISMA-style reporting. It imports references from tools and databases including EndNote, Zotero, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science; exports include DOCX, XLSX, RIS, BibTeX, and RevMan. Team controls include roles, comments, dual-person sign-off, conflict adjudication, and versioned audit snapshots. A free plan includes one lifetime review and one seat; Researcher costs $29 a month. Human validation is needed for screening suggestions, extracted values, risk-of-bias assessments, and draft reports. Recurring statistical refresh for living-review network meta-analysis is paused, though scheduled cycles can import, screen, and extract new evidence.