Axur Platform vs KELA Platform

Axur Platform provides AI-driven cybersecurity solutions for threats outside an organization’s perimeter. Its coverage includes cyber threat intelligence, brand protection, deep and dark web monitoring, threat hunting, online piracy mitigation, data leakage detection, executive protection, and external attack surface management. Brand protection detects phishing, typosquatting, fake profiles, fraudulent ads, and rogue apps, with automated takedown workflows. Axur says its first takedown notification is sent in under four minutes and its takedown success rate is 98.9%. Its threat intelligence uses information from thousands of sources and adds context such as threat actors, CVEs, TTPs, industry, and region. Threat Hunting searches a database of credentials, credit cards, leaked files, URLs, and domains, with an AI query builder. The web and API platform lists integrations including ServiceNow, Splunk, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Elastic Security SIEM, webhooks, n8n, and TAXII Server. It supports API and webhook connections for real-time threat signals, while CTI supports STIX/TAXII. Multi-factor authentication is mandatory, and role-based permissions are available. Pricing is custom and not listed as a standard platform price.

KELA Platform combines cybercrime-underground intelligence with an organization’s exposure and attack surface. Its capabilities cover cyber threat intelligence, continuous threat exposure management, vulnerability intelligence, digital risk protection, third-party risk management, AI trust risk and security management, and agentic AI. Data comes from sources including cybercrime forums, closed messaging channels, infostealer logs, leaked credentials, ransomware sites, exploit writeups, and external attack surfaces. KELA maps criminally discussed, weaponized, or sold exploits to CVE IDs before EPSS or KEV may identify them. The agentless SaaS platform starts with a domain and requires no sensors, installation, or setup. Findings can flow to SIEM, SOAR, and ticketing tools through integrations and the API. Third-party monitoring uses passive external scanning and supports exportable PDF or editable DOCX reports. Pricing is on request, and a 30-day trial is listed. A Cloud Attack Surface Management plan costs $65,000 a year for one seat and up to 500 FQDNs.