Azure Monitor vs Prometheus
Azure Monitor
azure.microsoft.comPrometheus
prometheus.ioSide by side
| Figure | Azure Monitor | Prometheus |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Spec score · Cloud Monitoring | 8.3 (#7) | 7.6 (#15) |
| Spec score · Infrastructure Monitoring | 8.4 (#8) | 7.7 (#23) |
| Spec score · Kubernetes Monitoring | 8.3 (#13) | 7.7 (#32) |
| Spec score · Metrics Monitoring Tools | 8.3 (#9) | 7.7 (#21) |
| Founded | 1975 | 2012 |
Plans
In their own words
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
Prometheus
Prometheus is a free, open-source toolkit for systems monitoring and alerting that collects metrics as time series. Each series is identified by a metric name and key-value labels, and PromQL is used to query the data. Prometheus typically gathers metrics by pulling over HTTP; it can also receive pushed data through an intermediary gateway. Targets can be found with service discovery or configured statically. The main server runs as a standalone monolithic binary without external dependencies, and official components are available as precompiled binaries and Docker images. Its ecosystem includes client libraries, exporters, Pushgateway and Alertmanager, with Grafana for visualization and webhooks for alert notifications. Prometheus and most exporters support TLS, client certificate authentication and HTTP Basic Authentication. The project advises against exposing component HTTP endpoints to public networks without protective measures. Servers do not depend on network storage or remote services, which the project says can help during outages. Prometheus is not recommended for uses requiring 100% accurate data, such as per-request billing.