Baz vs Cubic
Baz
baz.coCubic
cubic.devSide by side
| Figure | Baz | Cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $30/mo | $30/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 2 | 13 |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 8.2 (#16) | 9.3 (#2) |
| Spec score · Code review software | 8.2 (#22) | 9.3 (#2) |
| Company | Baz Technologies Inc. announced its launch and general availability on January 29, 2024. | The maker identifies itself as cubic and describes the company as backed by Y Combinator. |
| Integrations | Baz documentation lists GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps as repository providers. | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. |
| Product | Baz is an engineering review platform for implementation plans, pull requests, security findings, and merge decisions. | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. |
| Security | Baz states it is SOC 2 certified; its Private Mode documentation describes IP allowlisting, TLS, API-key authentication, and in-environment operation logs. | cubic says it is SOC 2 Type I compliant, encrypts data in transit with TLS 1.2+ and at rest with AES-256, and prohibits its AI providers from training on customer code. |
| Support | The pricing page lists community and email support for Pro, and dedicated support and onboarding for Enterprise. | The Pro and Max plans include premium support and a shared Slack channel with cubic engineers, while Enterprise offers dedicated support. |
Plans
Cubic
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
- Max$160 a month
- Max$160 a month
In their own words
Cubic
Cubic reviews pull requests with AI and scans codebases for bugs and security issues. It checks proposed changes against the wider codebase and team rules, including possible effects on other code, and learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback. The workflow can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, assign a merge confidence score from 1 to 5, and let coding agents fix findings. Cubic supports GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Cloud; GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet. It describes itself as language-agnostic and lists JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. Starter Free allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories. Team costs $30 a month billed yearly per developer; Pro is 79.00 USD and Max is $160 a month, also billed yearly per developer. For pull requests with more than 200 eligible files, Cubic selects up to 200 for review. Reviews pause after a team exceeds its line allowance unless an admin enables flex capacity at $20 per 10,000 extra lines.