Binder vs Bunnyshell
Binder
mybinder.orgBunnyshell
bunnyshell.comSide by side
| Figure | Binder | Bunnyshell |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | $0.01/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Spec score · Cloud Development Environments | 8.1 (#14) | 8.4 (#10) |
| Intended users | The project describes mybinder.org as a free public service for interactive and ephemeral coding and asks that it not be used as the backend for for-profit products. | Bunnyshell describes its customers as engineering teams, including developers, engineering leaders, and platform teams. |
Plans
Bunnyshell
- Startup$0.01 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
- ScaleupPriced on request
In their own words
Binder
Binder provides free, shareable computing environments built from public code repositories. BinderHub dynamically creates an environment image and runs a browser session. Documented sources include GitHub, GitLab, and GitHub Gist. JupyterLab is the default interface, with the classic notebook also available; examples cover Python, R, Julia, and Octave, plus RStudio, Shiny, Voilà, and Bokeh browser sessions. The public mybinder.org service requires no login and is intended for interactive, temporary coding rather than as a backend for for-profit products. Users receive at least 1 GB RAM and may receive up to 2 GB. Sessions shut down after more than 10 minutes of inactivity and aim for up to six hours or one CPU-hour for intensive work, without a continuation guarantee. Session contents are destroyed when users log off or become inactive, and there is no persistent storage. A repository may have up to 100 simultaneous sessions. Binder also supports self-hosting.
Bunnyshell
Bunnyshell has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.