Bito vs Cubic
Bito
bito.ai
Cubic
cubic.devSide by side
| Figure | Bito | Cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1/mo | $30/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 7 | 13 |
| Spec score · Code review software | 8.9 (#6) | 9.3 (#2) |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 8.8 (#8) | 9.3 (#2) |
| Spec score · Pull Request Automation Tools | 8.9 (#7) | 9.2 (#2) |
| Integrations | GitHub, GitHub (Self-Managed), GitLab, GitLab (Self-Managed), Bitbucket, Bitbucket (Self-Managed), Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, Windsurf | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. |
| Support | The Team plan lists a 24-hour response on business days, while Professional lists a 24-hour response every day. | The Pro and Max plans include premium support and a shared Slack channel with cubic engineers, while Enterprise offers dedicated support. |
Plans
Bito
- AI Code Reviews Team (annual)$12 a year
- AI Code Reviews Team (monthly)$15 a month
- AI Code Reviews Professional (annual)$20 a year
- AI Code Reviews Professional (monthly)$25 a month
- AI Architect EnterprisePriced on request
- AI Architect ProfessionalPriced on request
- AI Code Reviews EnterprisePriced on request
Cubic
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
- Max$160 a month
- Max$160 a month
In their own words
Bito
Bito provides AI code reviews and an AI Architect for software development teams. Code reviews run in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, and Windsurf, with line-level feedback, codebase-aware analysis, selectable review scope, one-click fixes, and Essential or Comprehensive modes. AI Architect maintains a live knowledge graph that maps a software system’s APIs, modules, and dependencies for coding agents. Bito says it supports 30+ programming languages and 20+ spoken languages. The code review product connects to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, including self-managed options on the Team plan. Workflow integrations listed include Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, Slack, Linear, and MCP for coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex. Bito offers cloud and self-hosted deployment; its CLI runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. A free plan and 14-day trial are available. AI Code Reviews Team costs $12 a year when billed annually, listed as $12 monthly per seat, with 5K lines per seat per month included; the monthly-billed Team plan costs $15 a month. Bito says it does not store code on its servers or use it for AI model training.
Cubic
Cubic reviews pull requests with AI and scans codebases for bugs and security issues. It checks proposed changes against the wider codebase and team rules, including possible effects on other code, and learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback. The workflow can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, assign a merge confidence score from 1 to 5, and let coding agents fix findings. Cubic supports GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Cloud; GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet. It describes itself as language-agnostic and lists JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. Starter Free allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories. Team costs $30 a month billed yearly per developer; Pro is 79.00 USD and Max is $160 a month, also billed yearly per developer. For pull requests with more than 200 eligible files, Cubic selects up to 200 for review. Reviews pause after a team exceeds its line allowance unless an admin enables flex capacity at $20 per 10,000 extra lines.