Bito vs Ironwood AI
Bito
bito.aiIronwood AI
ironwoodsolutions.aiSide by side
| Figure | Bito | Ironwood AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1/mo | $15/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 7 | 4 |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 8.8 (#8) | 8.3 (#13) |
| Support | The Team plan lists a 24-hour response on business days, while Professional lists a 24-hour response every day. | Ironwood can generate a sanitised support bundle for review before sharing; its support workflow is designed not to automatically upload source code or provider credentials. |
Plans
Bito
- AI Code Reviews Team (annual)$12 a year
- AI Code Reviews Team (monthly)$15 a month
- AI Code Reviews Professional (annual)$20 a year
- AI Code Reviews Professional (monthly)$25 a month
- AI Architect EnterprisePriced on request
- AI Architect ProfessionalPriced on request
- AI Code Reviews EnterprisePriced on request
Ironwood AI
- EvaluationFree
- Professional$15 a month
- Team$200 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
Bito
Bito provides AI code reviews and an AI Architect for software development teams. Code reviews run in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, and Windsurf, with line-level feedback, codebase-aware analysis, selectable review scope, one-click fixes, and Essential or Comprehensive modes. AI Architect maintains a live knowledge graph that maps a software system’s APIs, modules, and dependencies for coding agents. Bito says it supports 30+ programming languages and 20+ spoken languages. The code review product connects to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, including self-managed options on the Team plan. Workflow integrations listed include Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, Slack, Linear, and MCP for coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex. Bito offers cloud and self-hosted deployment; its CLI runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. A free plan and 14-day trial are available. AI Code Reviews Team costs $12 a year when billed annually, listed as $12 monthly per seat, with 5K lines per seat per month included; the monthly-billed Team plan costs $15 a month. Bito says it does not store code on its servers or use it for AI model training.
Ironwood AI
Ironwood AI reviews code using AI providers selected by the team, along with engineering context such as coding standards, architecture documents, requirements, and technical guidance. Engineers can inspect findings and supporting evidence before deciding what to do. Teams can review multiple repositories in a batch, including cross-repository analysis when service boundaries matter. Listed AI providers include OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and Ollama; source-control integrations include GitHub, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket. Jira, Azure Boards, and Confluence are listed for delivery workflows. Ironwood runs on infrastructure controlled by the customer, with local Admin, Reviewer, and Viewer roles; customers manage source-control and AI-provider credentials. Hosted AI providers receive review prompts and selected code or context, while Ollama can keep the AI request inside customer infrastructure. Ironwood says it does not need to receive or store source code, prompts, or findings to run a review. Professional includes PDF reports, role-based access control, platform health, and diagnostics. Evaluation is free for 30 days for two developers and one installation. Professional costs $15 a month; Team is $200 a month for up to 20 developers. AI-provider usage is billed separately.