Bito vs Sourcery
Bito
bito.ai
Sourcery
sourcery.aiSide by side
| Figure | Bito | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1/mo | $12/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 7 | 4 |
| Spec score · Code review software | 8.9 (#6) | 8.7 (#11) |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 8.8 (#8) | 8.7 (#10) |
| Spec score · Pull Request Automation Tools | 8.9 (#7) | 8.7 (#8) |
| Company size fit | solo, small, mid market, enterprise | solo, small, mid market, enterprise |
| Compliance | Bito states that it is SOC 2 Type II certified. | The company states that Sourcery is SOC 2 Type II compliant. |
| Deployment | Bito supports hosted cloud deployment, self-hosting, and on-premises deployment depending on plan. | cloud, self hosted, desktop |
| Integrations | GitHub, GitHub (Self-Managed), GitLab, GitLab (Self-Managed), Bitbucket, Bitbucket (Self-Managed), Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, Windsurf | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Jira |
| Support | The Team plan lists a 24-hour response on business days, while Professional lists a 24-hour response every day. | Support is offered through in-app chat and email, with documentation covering setup, reviews, scanning, IDEs, administration, API, and compliance. |
| Support channels | email, docs | email, docs |
Plans
Bito
- AI Code Reviews Team (annual)$12 a year
- AI Code Reviews Team (monthly)$15 a month
- AI Code Reviews Professional (annual)$20 a year
- AI Code Reviews Professional (monthly)$25 a month
- AI Architect EnterprisePriced on request
- AI Architect ProfessionalPriced on request
- AI Code Reviews EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
Bito
Bito provides AI code reviews and an AI Architect for software development teams. Code reviews run in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, and Windsurf, with line-level feedback, codebase-aware analysis, selectable review scope, one-click fixes, and Essential or Comprehensive modes. AI Architect maintains a live knowledge graph that maps a software system’s APIs, modules, and dependencies for coding agents. Bito says it supports 30+ programming languages and 20+ spoken languages. The code review product connects to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, including self-managed options on the Team plan. Workflow integrations listed include Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, Slack, Linear, and MCP for coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex. Bito offers cloud and self-hosted deployment; its CLI runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. A free plan and 14-day trial are available. AI Code Reviews Team costs $12 a year when billed annually, listed as $12 monthly per seat, with 5K lines per seat per month included; the monthly-billed Team plan costs $15 a month. Bito says it does not store code on its servers or use it for AI model training.
Sourcery
Sourcery reviews pull requests with AI, returning a summary, review comments and suggested fixes within minutes. Users can apply a suggestion as a change and commit it to the pull request. Security checks cover committed secrets, static-analysis vulnerabilities, infrastructure-as-code misconfigurations, dependencies and licenses. The extension works in VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf and JetBrains editors, and Sourcery supports GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server and self-hosted GitLab. Open Source checks security on every pull request; Open Source and Pro also scan twice a week, while Team includes nightly scans. The public REST API, for listing, reading, counting and bulk-updating security findings and groups, is a Team feature. Open Source is free; Pro is $12 a month billed annually, or $15 per developer per month billed monthly. Team is $24 a month billed annually, or $30 per developer per month billed monthly. A 14-day Team-feature trial is available organization-wide after installation, without a credit card. Sourcery says it does not retain customer code after reviews or use it to train models.