Black Duck SCA vs Bomly CLI
| Black Duck SCA | Bomly CLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | BitBake, Cargo, Carthage, CocoaPods, Conan, Conda, CPAN, CRAN, Dart, Go, Gradle, Hex, Ivy, Lerna, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PEAR, pip, pnpm, Poetry, RubyGems, SBT, Setuptools, Swift, Yarn, Xcode, OPAM, UV, Rush | C++, Dart, .NET/NuGet, Elixir, GitHub Actions, Go, Maven, Gradle, npm, pnpm, Yarn, Bun, PHP/Composer, Python/pip/Pipenv/Poetry/uv, Ruby/Bundler, Rust/Cargo, Scala/SBT, Swift/CocoaPods/SwiftPM, plus Syft-backed ecosystems |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Specifiction, Bomly CLI scores higher on our published basis.