Blok vs RichTextEditor
Blok
blokeditor.com
RichTextEditor
richtexteditor.comSide by side
| Figure | Blok | RichTextEditor |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 4 |
| Spec score · Rich Text Editor Software | 7.5 (#19) | 7.9 (#12) |
| Deployment | The documentation describes client-side embeds that match URLs against a built-in registry and resolve them into provider-sanctioned iframe URLs. | The editor runtime is self-hosted with the customer’s application, and content does not need to pass through RichScripts infrastructure. |
| Integrations | The embed block supports provider URLs from YouTube, Vimeo, Figma, CodePen, and more than 100 services. | The vendor lists native bindings for JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Vue, Angular, Blazor, ASP.NET, PHP, and Classic ASP. |
| Support | The homepage invites teams to contact the maker through Telegram or email for setup and customization help. | Paid licenses include standard, premium, or ultimate support depending on tier, and the support page states a 1–2 business day response expectation. |
Plans
RichTextEditor
- Domain$129, paid once
- Small Business$299, paid once
- Enterprise$999, paid once
- Source Code$3,999, paid once
In their own words
RichTextEditor
RichTextEditor has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.