Bonita vs Cadence
Bonita
ofelia.com
Cadence
cadenceworkflow.ioSide by side
| Figure | Bonita | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Spec score · Process Orchestration Software | 8.5 (#7) | 8.0 (#9) |
| Spec score · Workflow Orchestration Software | 8.4 (#12) | 8.0 (#15) |
| Deployment | Bonita can be deployed on-premise or self-hosted in a customer’s own infrastructure, including its own cloud, with configurable data residency. | Deployment options include embedded SQLite, Docker Compose, and Kubernetes with Helm; the page also lists a managed Uber cluster for Uber internal teams. |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Support | The product page describes premium enterprise support with direct access to senior engineers and no tiered support model. | The project points users to Stack Overflow, CNCF Slack, GitHub Issues, and community contributors for support. |
Plans
In their own words
Cadence
Cadence has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.