Bookmark.new vs floccus
Bookmark.new
bookmark.newfloccus
floccus.orgSide by side
| Figure | Bookmark.new | floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $10/mo | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | — |
| iOS | — | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Spec score · Bookmark Managers | 8.2 (#10) | 8.4 (#4) |
| Privacy | The privacy page says page text is stored on the maker’s servers for syncing, while AI inference runs on-device and bookmark content is not sent to third-party AI services for summarization. | Floccus says its authors and app publishers do not receive the data users provide, while chosen third-party storage services can access stored bookmarks. |
Plans
In their own words
Bookmark.new
Bookmark.new has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
floccus
floccus syncs browser bookmarks and open tabs across supported browsers and devices. It works with Nextcloud Bookmarks, Linkwarden, KaraKeep, Git, WebDAV, Google Drive, and Dropbox, and offers two-way merge sync or one-way uploads and downloads. floccus syncs browsers’ native bookmarks rather than providing its own bookmark-management interface. Its guides list Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera, Vivaldi, Brave, and Kiwi; Safari is unsupported. Android and iOS apps are available, though the Android app is in open beta and keeps bookmarks inside the app rather than syncing them with mobile browsers. Tab syncing can replace a local bookmarks folder, but may create duplicate tabs. WebDAV and Google Drive support an encryption password for end-to-end encrypted sync; Nextcloud Bookmarks and Git do not. floccus describes itself as free and open source, with no ads or data collection. Its plan is free and requires a compatible storage service or server. Selected storage services can access stored bookmarks.